After an elapsed time of seven years, I have completed one of the versions (there are multiple) of the BBC’s Big Read except for one book. I. Just. Could. Not. Finish. “Ulysses”. I tried and tried. I started with just the regular reading process I used on the other books. I used an audio book version for a while but became discouraged with the astronomical amount of time it would take to listen to the entire book. (Although I did enjoy hearing it with the speaker’s Irish brogue). In desperation, I reviewed some on-line Spark Notes. What I most appreciated about the Spark Notes were the comments left by other struggling readers.
“Ulysses” is a long book but it is not the longest book on the list. I think “Les Miserables” was the longest book on the list. I did not object to “Ulysses”‘ length, except for the scope of the book is one day. Yes, all those pages for just one day! It does follow several characters throughout the day so it is not restricted to one person’s stream of consciousness and actions throughout the day; however, the multiple characters sometimes caused confusion as well. Sometimes I was unable to decide who exactly was speaking at a given time. I also became frustrated with the extreme detail describing rather trivial matters, like deciding into which pocket an item should be placed. After all, how much can really happen in one day with a group of people? The answer: not much. There is not much of a plot. There is a great deal of wandering around; but, one of the characters does go to a funeral and there is an interesting discussion about Hamlet.
Even its word cloud seems rather boring to me.
Since I selected this BBC Big Read List in 2010, I have become aware that there are multiple versions of the list. I would love to find one that excludes “Ulysses”. I could be persuaded to read any books I am missing from that list just for the privilege of completing the list without “Ulysses”. In fact, I would even rather re-read “Les Miserables”, this time in the original French language, than finish “Ulysses”.
I expect that really serious, professional literary critics would find my comments unenlightened but that is okay with me. At least I tried.